The closest comparison on this site. Both products send a technician to a job, capture a check-in with photos, and publish it to the contractor's own website. The differences are narrower than the other two comparisons and they matter more.
Whatever they actually did, in as few words as they like. The AI enhancement takes “replaced cap. 3 ton unit, upstairs” and writes it out as prose a homeowner would read, varying persona and length between check-ins on purpose so a city page does not read as forty runs of one template.
Check-in and post text is also checked before publishing for keyword stuffing, repeated phrasing across check-ins, and city-name stuffing. It warns; it does not block. The technician stays in charge of their own words.
The RealWork Mobile listing describes the workflow this way:
“The job workflow allows field users to describe the work they are doing at a job site using keywords that the business wants to be associated with in online searches.”
That was ordinary advice for years and it is a defensible instruction. It is riskier now: Google's March 2026 core update suspended US small-business profiles for keyword stuffing, and keyword-led job descriptions repeated across dozens of city pages are the pattern that draws it.
Source: RealWork Mobile on the App Store — checked 16 September 2026An auto check-in can fire when the van enters a geofence around the job, bounded by a maximum per day, a minimum interval between them, and a minimum distance from the last one. The guards exist because uncapped automatic content is its own quality problem.
There is also a reminder that nudges the technician when they arrive, for teams that would rather keep it manual.
RealWork does use geofencing, and it is worth being precise about where: its release notes describe geofencing app notifications to job locations, so the technician is prompted at the right moment.
That is the same idea as our arrival reminder. What we did not find described is a geofence that creates the check-in itself when nobody responds to the prompt.
Source: RealWork Mobile release notes on the App Store — checked 16 September 2026Faces and licence plates are detected and blurred automatically. A job photo taken in a driveway routinely catches a homeowner, a child, or a plate, and publishing that to a public page is a problem a contractor should not have to remember to avoid.
Objects in the image are also detected and labelled, which is what lets photo content carry more than a filename.
Photos and video are captured on site and, per the app listing, “automatically posted to a business' website and any integrated third parties”.
Their published guidance on what ends up in the frame is an instruction to the technician — “clean it up”, remove personal items before photographing. Good advice, and it is a person remembering rather than a check. That guidance covers clutter; it does not mention faces or licence plates, and we found no automatic blurring or object detection described anywhere in their public material.
Source: RealWork blog, photo practices for quality check-ins — checked 16 September 2026The destination is decided before the customer rates. Requests go by SMS, email, QR code, and a phone number that records an audio testimonial. A QR review is not counted until the customer verifies by email or SMS, because a yard sign can be scanned by anyone.
Businesses with more than one Google Business Profile have reviewers routed to the profile nearest them automatically. The full decision tree is published.
Requests go out “automatically based on your job workflows, triggered by your CRM”, by “email or text message, depending on the homeowner's preference”, and technicians can also collect a review in person as the job wraps.
Nothing in their public material describes screening customers by sentiment, and we are not going to imply otherwise. What it also does not set out is the routing logic itself — which is the question to put to them, and to us.
Source: realworklabs.com/solutions — checked 16 September 2026AI Visibility Tracking, a paid add-on to the account. A fixed set of questions — the ones a customer would actually type, in the cities that business actually works in — put to six answer engines on a weekly schedule: Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Grok. Through each engine's API rather than a logged-in session, because a logged-in session carries your history and answers you rather than a homeowner in the city you are asking about.
Every reply is kept, and four things are read out of it: whether the business was named, where it fell inside that answer, which other businesses were named alongside it, and which model said so on which day. An outage, a refusal or a timeout is recorded as “could not check” and kept out of the denominator, because somebody else's bad afternoon is not your client's bad month.
And it prints no score, no grade and no ranking — not on a screen, not in an export, not in an email. What it prints instead is a citation rate, always beside the two counts it was calculated from, and the sampling caveat in full next to the figures rather than in a footnote at the end. The competitor names in each answer are kept too, which is the part agencies end up using most.
This is the sentence the product prints beside every figure — on the dashboard, in the export and inside the monthly scorecard, unabbreviated in all three:
Each figure is a sample: one question put once to one model through its API on the date shown. Answer engines reply differently to different people, in different sessions and as their models change, so this is evidence of what an engine said when it was asked — not a position, a ranking or a score.How AI Visibility Tracking works →
Their material does describe AI, and it is worth being precise about which AI. On the solutions page it is “Use AI to draft a response and tailor as you see fit” for review replies, and AI to “write job descriptions, reviews responses, and more”. That is drafting help for the business's own words — useful, and not a record of what somebody else's model says about them.
They do publish neighbourhood visibility tracking through geo-grids, and we want to be fair about it: that is a real measurement, and we sell one too. It measures where a business places on the map across an area, which is a different question from this one. A map grid cannot tell you whether ChatGPT named the business, because ChatGPT is not on the map.
We found nothing in their public material describing answer-engine tracking of any kind, and that is the whole of what we are saying.
Source: realworklabs.com/solutions and the RealWork Mobile App Store listing — both checked 16 September 2026$155 to $239 per location per month, on the pricing page, unlimited users, no setup fee, 14-day trial.
Agencies get the deepest white-label layer in the category: branded domains, themes, knowledge bases, and four white-labelled mobile apps live in the app stores under partners' own names.
No prices are published on the site; the route to a number is a demo request. We found no white-label or agency reseller programme described in their public material.
Source: realworklabs.com/solutions — checked 16 September 2026| Capability | Nearby Now | RealWork Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Geotagged field check-ins | Yes | Yes |
| Check-ins published to your own site with schema | Yes | Yes |
| Review requests by SMS and email | Yes | Yes |
| Routing that never screens by sentiment | Yes, published in full | No sentiment step described |
| AI written from the technician's own note | Natural prose, varied voice | Keyword-led description |
| Warning before risky text publishes | Yes | Not described |
| Geofenced arrival prompt for the technician | Yes | Yes |
| Geofence that creates the check-in itself, with caps | Yes | Not described |
| Keeping people out of published job photos | Automatic face and plate blurring | Technician instructed to clean up the shot |
| Object detection on job photos | Yes | Not described |
| Audio testimonials by phone | Yes | Not described |
| Thin-city warning before you publish a page | Yes | Not described |
| Tracking what answer engines say about you | Yes — add-on, six engines | Not described |
| White-label / agency reseller programme | Yes | Not described |
| Published pricing | Yes | No |
“Not described” means exactly that: we could not find the capability in RealWork Labs' own public material — their site, their solutions page, their check-in guidance and their App Store listing, all read on 16 September 2026 — and we are not going to claim it is absent from a product we have not run. If we have missed something, tell us and this page changes.
Decentralising a contractor's online presence out to where the work happens is correct, and they execute it. This is not a comparison against a product that misunderstands the problem.
Review requests trigger from the job workflow through the CRM. Nothing in their material describes a sentiment step, and we are not going to insinuate one that we did not find.
Contractors report using their photo portfolio in the sales conversation itself, not just for SEO. That is a real use we hear about less often from our own customers.
We do call tracking, GeoGrids, web chat, GBP publishing and an agency layer as well. If you want check-ins and reviews and nothing else, that breadth is overhead.
Fourteen days, no card, no setup fee. Check in on a few real jobs and compare what lands on the page.